International Viewpoint Archive

The Fourth International’s English-language review, from 1982

Americas: USA: High Crimes and Misdemeanours

· International Viewpoint No. 304, October 1998 · pp 2-4 · 1,559 words

NeWS

PRESIDANTS

PENIS

DENIES

Steve Bell 1998

TRACK

WEAPONS

LAW

USA

High crimes and misdemeanours

The release of Kenneth Starr's report on President Clinton has set off a media storm. Hypocrisy and puritanism has drowned out others issues, from the spreading world economic crisis to the predictable debacle of America's "welfare reform". Barry Sheppard

International Viewpoin

Analysis with attitude!

YOUR NAME

ADDRESS

CITY CODE

COUNTRY E-MAIL/O

Starr's report was turned over to the

Judiciary Committee of the Republicancontrolled House of Representatives, which will make a recommendation to the

House as a whole whether to proceed with impeachment hearings. If after these hearings the House should vote for impeachment, then the Senate will hold a trial on whether Clinton should be removed from office or not.

A high point in this media blitz was supposed to be the release of a video tape, played on television around the world, of

Г

-half price

L-

Eleven issues,

Britain/Irelanc

Denmark

Germany

Greece

Holland

Sweden

Clinton's testimony to the grand jury concerning his affair with White House intern

Monica Lewinsky. But it turned out to be a dud. Nothing new was revealed. The great majority of people in the US already knew about the affair, and about Clinton's attempts to deny it. A big majority think

Clinton lied about it, but also think he shouldn't be forced from office, even if he lied under oath.

Viewers who saw the video tape were confronted with a four-hour interrogation.

Clinton was asked details of exactly what

• -

- tor all new readers!

------delivered by airmail for only renewal new subscribers

£25

£13

)K 380

DKK200

DM 110

DM 55

6000 dr

3000 dr f95

0 f50

SEK 400

SEK 200

J

Australia/NZ

Send no cash with order. We will invoice you.

Canada

PO Box 27410, London SW9 9WQ, Britain.

USA e-mail <[email protected]>

Rest of world

70

0

$

35

C$ 80

C$ 40

US$ 70

0

US$ 35

US$ 70

US$ 35

163 46 Howton, in. 9719048. Editor and director: Yannis Felekis, Eressou 34, 106 81 Athens, Greece. Printed by loannis Kotsatos & Cia, Marinou Antipa 4, 163 46 llioupoli,

ISSN: 1294 2925. A monthly analytical review published by Intermational Viewpoint, PO Box 27410, London SW9 9WQ, Britain. e-mail <[email protected]>.

2 International Viewpoint #304

kind of sex he had with Lewinsky - for example, how did Clinton's semen get on Lewinsky's dress?

One New York Times columnist said "the Starr report already resembles the surveillance records of a private detective. The grand jury deposition puts us, aesthetically speaking, in the position of watching a police interrogation. Many who watch this spectacle will surely imagine themselves in the same chair and wonder just how forthrightly they would react to similar grilling... "Granted, this is not... the Moscow trials of the 1930s. Unlike... Nikolai Bukharin, Mr. Clinton will physically survive this process. But the intent to destroy him politically is no less evident".

Another New York Times writer says, "Today, when you turn on the Sunday 'news' programmes, you might be watching Mr. Starr's prosecutors rehearsing. They sound like a crowd at an auto-de-fé, a burning at the stake in the Inquisition"

If they can do this to the President, what could they do to you or me? Most people have lied some time about their sex lives, and most are embarrassed about at least some things they have done sexually. And most don't want prosecutors to be prying into their private affairs.

Starr is connected with the Christian Right in the Republican party. He has presumably focused on the Lewinsky affair, rather than on the Clintons' shady financial deals, because he cannot find proof -a "smoking gun" - in these other inquiries.

But there is another side to Starr's motivation. The Christian Right wants to shift attention to its favourite "moral" issues, which are often connected to sexuality. They want to completely outlaw abortion. They want to enforce "sodomy"

laws against gay men, and overturn any equal treatment legislation for homosexuals. Divorce should be made more difficult — abolished if possible. Women should recognise their husbands as their natural superiors and God-ordained heads of the household.

The Christian Right are against the separation of church and state, and want to reintroduce religious education into the schools — their religion, of course. Evolution should not be taught. They want the

US to become a fundamentalist Christian theocracy. By raising Clinton's sexual misconduct, they hope to further their claim that the country has gone down hill morally, under the influence of the movements that sprung from the 1960s and 70s, including the women's liberation movement, the gay and lesbian rights movement, and the relatively greater freedom from sexual repression that has developed since then.

The decisive sections of the ruling class have found it convenient to rely on the Christian Right as a battering ram against gains made by women, gays.

hacks and others. but they by no means wish to put the Christian Right in power blacks and hers but te by •at this historical juncture, if ever. this historical juncture, I ever. Also, Clinton has done a good jo. b from the point of view of big business and Wall Street. Whether Clinton is thrown out of office or not, which at this point seems unlikely, the powers that be will also clip Starr's wings. Though they will presumably keep this particular brand of reactionaries around, to help get out the vote for more right wing politicians, and pull the ideological struggle to the right.

Clinton still gets high marks from most people for "how he does his job" while most take a dim view of him as a person. Americans tend to favour incumbents when the economy is doing good. (The growing economic storm world-wide threatens the US economy, but the effect hasn't yet been felt by most Americans.) This isn't the 1970s, when the US was in a war, with US soldiers coming home dead and disabled. So — "don't rock the boat" is a widespread political philosophy.

Of course, Clinton has played the "soft cop" to the Republican's "hard cop". He has moved the Democratic Party to the right and essentially adopted the Republican domestic programme.

For example, many in his party supported, and he signed, the Republican's law eliminating welfare as a federal right. Though he did criticise the harsher aspects of the law, such as requiring the states to throw many immigrants off the welfare rolls. So he looks to be more compassionate about the poor than the Republicans.

The Republicans are seen as anti-union and anti-worker. While doing very little for the unions, Clinton and the Democrats still have union leaders' support.

The Republicans make no bones about their disregard for blacks. Most are against affirmative action. Bill Clinton's support among blacks is especially high. His close personal friend, Vernon Jordon, is black, as is his personal secretary, Betty Currie.

Clinton is formally for affirmative action

- though not if this "penalises" whites.

But when the issue was on the ballot in

California, he hardly said anything, and the anti-affirmative action initiative won.

While the Republicans are against abortion, Clinton more or less supports the right to choose. He has vetoed some very bad bills that many Democrats supported along with the Republicans.

Even many Republican voters don't think he should be thrown out of office for his affair and lying about it.

The Constitution says that a President can be impeached and tried for "high crimes and misdemeanours"

The present noise about the Lewinsky affair actually diverts attention from the real high crimes and misdemeanours of

Clinton and his Republican predecessors.

Little things like bombing Iraq and threatening to do it again, tightening the blockade of Cuba, sending cruise missiles into Afghanistan and the Sudan, arming dictators like Suharto in Indonesia and elsewhere, and presiding over an imperialist globalisation that is destroying the lives of hundreds of millions around fine ground the world, and that threatens the entire world itself. * ntonte contents americas

USA: High crimes and

2 misdemeanours

• Barry Sheppard

USA: Lessons from the GM strike

4

• Kim Moody

USA/Mexico: the Han Young

6 campaign • MLNA europe

Europe's labour left

7

• François Vercammen

European appeal for trade union

8 left • Document

Spain: Philips workers refuse

9

"flexibilisation

• Juan Montero

Sweden: Breakthrough for the Left

10

Party • Peter Lindgren

Is Russia bankrupt? • Aleksandr

12

Buzgalin & Andrei Kolganov

Russia: the force of inertia • Boris

13

Kagarlitsky

Poland: OPZZ - the ability to

14 mobilise • Dalej!

Poland: Anti-Semitism in 1968

14

• Marek Torunsk

'feature

16 Can European Monetary Union:

work? What social protests will it provoke? • François Vercammen asia

Malaysia: Winds of change

18

• B. Skanthakumar

Malaysia: Neoliberal reformasi?

20

• Syed Husin Ali

22 Australia: election report

• John Tully

Sri Lanka: Sinhala left reconsiders

23 support for war • LSSP statement

Japan: Big vote for Communists

24

• Jun'ichi Hira

Israel: "Boycott settlers" says

26

Peace Bloc • Adam Keller

(interview)

africa

28 The situation in Congo

• Eric Toussaint

29 Lesotho: South Africa's shame

• WOSA statement regular features

Conference reports

30

Book reviews

31

Obituaries: Zheng Chaolin and

32

Luís de Sousa Graça

News from the International

34

Institute for Research and

Education in Amsterdam

Left media review

36

* USA

← Regular Features: The 15th International Youth Camp Sponsored by the 4th International · Americas: USA: Lessons from the GM Strike →

Something wrong on this page?